AI readiness report
hblhpackaging.com
8/15
Invisible
Hard gate failed. At least one group A check failed, so the verdict is capped at “Invisible” however well the rest of the page scores. Group A asks whether an AI engine can reach the page at all.
Positioning: English-language site aimed abroad (overseas). The hard gate depends on this: an English-language site is measured on the international AI crawlers, a Chinese-language site on the China ecosystem.
Fix in this order
- A4 No dead-link pollution A failed group A check caps your grade at Invisible however well everything else scores, so this one unlocks the grade.
- A5 Reachable and HTTPS is valid A failed group A check caps your grade at Invisible however well everything else scores, so this one unlocks the grade.
- C3 There is original data or first-hand information 93% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
- C4 There is a visible last-updated date 86% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
- B1 Title and description are complete 64% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
- B3 Heading hierarchy is semantic 50% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
A. Can AI reach you?
Can an AI engine reach the page at all?
-
A4 No dead-link pollution Fail
16 of 20 checked internal link(s) failed (80.0%), above the 1% threshold. Returning an error: http://hblhpackaging.com/Product, http://hblhpackaging.com/About, http://hblhpackaging.com/News (and 13 more).
How to fix it. Fix or redirect the broken internal links. Crawlers spend a limited budget, and 404s waste it.
-
A5 Reachable and HTTPS is valid Fail
The page was not served over https.
How to fix it. Serve the site over HTTPS with a valid certificate, force HTTPS, and load every subresource over https:// as well.
-
A1 robots.txt allows the AI crawlers Pass
All 11 international AI crawlers may fetch the site (0 declared explicitly). At the edge (does not affect the score): robots.txt allows these crawlers, but a real request with their own user-agent was refused — GPTBot → HTTP 404, ClaudeBot → HTTP 404, PerplexityBot → HTTP 404. A CDN or WAF rule is blocking them before your site sees the request.
-
A2 Content is in the HTML, not only after JavaScript Pass
The raw HTML already contains 2216 characters of readable text, so a crawler that does not run JavaScript can read the page.
-
A3 A sitemap exists Pass
The sitemap is valid XML (a single sitemap) listing 134 URL(s); no entry carries <lastmod>, so a crawler cannot tell when anything changed; the homepage is not listed. First entry: http://www.hblhpackaging.com/.
B. Can AI understand who you are?
Can it tell who you are and what the page is about?
-
B1 Title and description are complete Fail
Problems: description is 195 characters (aim for 50-160). Title: "Hebei Lunhao Trading co.,Ltd"; description: "Hebei Lunhao Trading Co.,Ltd is a leading name into providing all kind of cosmetic packag…".
How to fix it. Give every page a unique <title> that names the subject, and a meta description that states what the page answers. They are the first thing an AI reads to decide what the page is about.
-
B3 Heading hierarchy is semantic Fail
Problems: no <h1>. Structure: no headings at all.
How to fix it. Use exactly one <h1> for the page subject and nest <h2>/<h3> in order. Headings are how an AI splits the page into quotable sections.
-
B2 Structured data (JSON-LD) is present Pass
1 JSON-LD block(s) parsed; types include Organization, WebPage, WebSite.
-
B4 An llms.txt is present Pass
llms.txt is present: 145 line(s), 7 heading(s) (Hebei Lunhao Trading co.,Ltd › Website › 首页 › …), 134 link(s).
-
B5 The operator behind the site is verifiable Pass
3 trust signal(s) found: an about/contact link, an email address, a copyright line.
C. Will AI choose to cite you?
Will it choose to quote you rather than someone else?
-
C1 The conclusion comes first Fail
The first paragraph is only 28 characters: "Hebei Lunhao Trading Co.,Ltd".
How to fix it. State the answer in a complete sentence within the first 100 words, before any background or navigation text.
This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 70%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.
-
C3 There is original data or first-hand information Fail
Only 0 percentage figure(s) and 0 data point(s) were found — mostly generic prose.
How to fix it. Publish first-hand numbers: measurements you took, sample sizes, pass rates, before/after results. This is the content an AI cannot generate itself, and therefore the strongest reason for it to cite you.
This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 60%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.
-
C4 There is a visible last-updated date Fail
No updated date was found in the page text or metadata.
How to fix it. Display the last revision date where a reader can see it; AI engines favour dated content for time-sensitive answers.
-
C2 There are extractable structure blocks Pass
Found 5 list(s) with 3+ items — these can be lifted out of the page as a self-contained answer.
-
C5 There is third-party reference evidence Pass
8 distinct external domain(s) referenced.
Analysis is unavailable right now, so this report shows only what was measured.
Score history
One measurement so far. Apply the fixes above, then recheck to prove the score moved.
| Measured | Score | Change | Fixed | Newly failing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct, 13:14 First measurement | 8 / 15 | — | — | — |
Share this result
Next step
Apply the failing checks above in group order — group A first, because a site that cannot be reached or read cannot be cited. Then recheck to see the score move.
The pack contains robots.txt, llms.txt and a JSON-LD
block, plus a deploy script that is a dry run by default and backs
up anything it replaces, and a verify script that confirms the deploy landed.
Report generated 2026-10-02T13:14:34 (UTC).