aeolith.com

A. Can AI reach you?

Can an AI engine reach the page at all?

1. A1 robots.txt allows the AI crawlers Pass

   All 11 international AI crawlers may fetch the site (11 declared explicitly).

2. A2 Content is in the HTML, not only after JavaScript Pass

   The raw HTML already contains 1527 characters of readable text, so a crawler that does not run JavaScript can read the page.

3. A3 A sitemap exists Pass

   The sitemap is valid XML and lists 2 URL(s); first entry: https://aeolith.com/.

4. A4 No dead-link pollution Pass

   0 of 1 checked internal link(s) failed (0.0%), below the 1% threshold.

5. A5 Reachable and HTTPS is valid Pass

   The homepage answers HTTP 200 over HTTPS and certificate valid for 89 more day(s); no mixed content found.

B. Can AI understand who you are?

Can it tell who you are and what the page is about?

1. B1 Title and description are complete Pass

   Title (39 chars): "Aeolith — AI Visibility & GEO Readiness"; description (76 chars) present.

2. B2 Structured data (JSON-LD) is present Pass

   1 JSON-LD block(s) parsed; types include ContactPoint, Organization, WebSite.

3. B3 Heading hierarchy is semantic Pass

   One <h1> and a well-formed hierarchy: [1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3].

4. B4 An llms.txt is present Pass

   llms.txt is present: 6 line(s), 2 heading(s), 2 link(s).

5. B5 The operator behind the site is verifiable Pass

   3 trust signal(s) found: an email address, a copyright line, Organization markup.

C. Will AI choose to cite you?

Will it choose to quote you rather than someone else?

1. C3 There is original data or first-hand information Fail

   Only 0 percentage figure(s) and 0 data point(s) were found — mostly generic prose.

   How to fix it. Publish first-hand numbers: measurements you took, sample sizes, pass rates, before/after results. This is the content an AI cannot generate itself, and therefore the strongest reason for it to cite you.

   This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 60%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.

2. C5 There is third-party reference evidence Fail

   Only 0 external domain(s) referenced. No third-party signal was visible on this page.

   How to fix it. Build citable off-site presence: an organisation profile, an open-source repository, industry directories, and mentions on sites your customers already trust. AI weighs external signals when deciding authority.

   This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 50%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.

3. C1 The conclusion comes first Pass

   The first paragraph (120 chars) opens with a statement: "A free 15-point check that shows whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity can find, understand and cite your site.".

4. C2 There are extractable structure blocks Pass

   Found 5 list(s) with 3+ items — these can be lifted out of the page as a self-contained answer.

5. C4 There is a visible last-updated date Pass

   A visible 'updated' date was found (23 Sep 2026).

Score history

One measurement so far. Apply the fixes above, then recheck to prove the score moved.

Next step

Apply the failing checks above in group order — group A first, because a site that cannot be reached or read cannot be cited. Then recheck to see the score move.

The pack contains robots.txt, llms.txt and a JSON-LD block, plus a deploy script that is a dry run by default and backs up anything it replaces, and a verify script that confirms the deploy landed.

Report generated 2026-09-23T09:42:27 (UTC).