AI readiness report

www.hxmffurnace.com

8/15

Occasionally cited

8 of 15 checks passed · Standard v1.2 · Engine 0.1.0-m0

Positioning: English-language site aimed abroad (overseas). The hard gate depends on this: an English-language site is measured on the international AI crawlers, a Chinese-language site on the China ecosystem.

Fix in this order

  1. C3 There is original data or first-hand information 93% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
  2. B2 Structured data (JSON-LD) is present 86% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
  3. C4 There is a visible last-updated date 86% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
  4. B4 An llms.txt is present 79% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
  5. B1 Title and description are complete 64% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.
  6. B3 Heading hierarchy is semantic 50% of the sites we have measured fail this check — it is the common case, not an edge case.

A. Can AI reach you?

Can an AI engine reach the page at all?

  1. A1 robots.txt allows the AI crawlers Pass

    All 11 international AI crawlers may fetch the site (0 declared explicitly).

  2. A2 Content is in the HTML, not only after JavaScript Pass

    The raw HTML already contains 4077 characters of readable text, so a crawler that does not run JavaScript can read the page.

  3. A3 A sitemap exists Pass

    The sitemap is valid XML and lists 69 URL(s); first entry: https://www.hxmffurnace.com.

  4. A4 No dead-link pollution Pass

    0 of 20 checked internal link(s) failed (0.0%), below the 1% threshold.

  5. A5 Reachable and HTTPS is valid Pass

    The homepage answers HTTP 200 over HTTPS and certificate valid for 27 more day(s); no mixed content found.

B. Can AI understand who you are?

Can it tell who you are and what the page is about?

  1. B1 Title and description are complete Fail

    Problems: title is 104 characters (aim for 10-70), description is 360 characters (aim for 50-160). Title: "Induction Melting furnace, electric melting furnace, mf induction furnace,induc…"; description: "Huaxin is a professional induction melting furnace manufacturer comes from China, it lead…".

    How to fix it. Shorten the title to between 10 and 70 characters and the description to between 50 and 160 characters; they are currently 104 and 360 characters, so both get cut off. Keep the main product terms in the shortened title and description.tailored to this site

  2. B2 Structured data (JSON-LD) is present Fail

    No application/ld+json block was found.

    How to fix it. Add an application/ld+json block to the page; none was found. Mark up the organisation and product details that already appear in the visible text.tailored to this site

  3. B3 Heading hierarchy is semantic Fail

    Problems: 6 <h1> elements (expected exactly one). Heading sequence: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1].

    How to fix it. Use exactly one <h1> on the page and change the other five to <h2> or <h3> so the heading sequence descends in order instead of sitting at six level-1 headings.tailored to this site

  4. B4 An llms.txt is present Fail

    No llms.txt was found at the site root.

    How to fix it. Publish a plain-text llms.txt file at the site root listing the pages you want AI crawlers to read; no llms.txt was found there.tailored to this site

  5. B5 The operator behind the site is verifiable Pass

    3 trust signal(s) found: an about/contact link, a phone number, a postal address.

C. Will AI choose to cite you?

Will it choose to quote you rather than someone else?

  1. C3 There is original data or first-hand information Fail

    Only 1 percentage figure(s) and 1 data point(s) were found — mostly generic prose.

    How to fix it. Add first-hand figures from your own production, testing or QC records; only 1 percentage figure and 1 data point were found on the page. Attach the source and date to each figure so a reader can verify it.tailored to this site

    This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 60%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.

  2. C4 There is a visible last-updated date Fail

    No updated date was found in the page text or metadata.

    How to fix it. Show a last-updated date in the page text and in the page metadata; no updated date was found in either.tailored to this site

  3. C5 There is third-party reference evidence Fail

    Only 0 external domain(s) referenced. No third-party signal was visible on this page.

    How to fix it. Reference external sources you actually rely on, such as standards bodies or industry references; 0 external domains are currently linked from the page. Each citation should point to a real, reachable third-party page.tailored to this site

    This rule cannot decide reliably on its own (confidence 50%), so treat it as a suggestion rather than a verdict.

  4. C1 The conclusion comes first Pass

    The first paragraph (143 chars) opens with a statement: "We consider quality control as the lifeline of our company, which has earned us an excellent reputation among customers in the relevant fie…".

  5. C2 There are extractable structure blocks Pass

    Found 5 list(s) with 3+ items — these can be lifted out of the page as a self-contained answer.

Analysis · written from the measurements above

The crawlability basics are in place — crawlers are allowed, content is in the raw HTML, a sitemap exists, links resolve, and HTTPS is valid — so the gaps are in page structure and evidence rather than access. Priority fixes are on-page: collapse the six h1 elements to one, add a JSON-LD block, create an llms.txt at the root, and rewrite the title and meta description to fit the stated length ranges. After that, add a visible last-updated date, cite external sources, and include more first-hand figures or data points, since the page currently reads as generic prose.

Score history

One measurement so far. Apply the fixes above, then recheck to prove the score moved.

1 measurement, 15 checks each.
MeasuredScoreChangeFixedNewly failing
29 Sep, 02:35 First measurement 8 / 15 — — —

Next step

Apply the failing checks above in group order — group A first, because a site that cannot be reached or read cannot be cited. Then recheck to see the score move.

Download the repair pack

The pack contains robots.txt, llms.txt and a JSON-LD block, plus a deploy script that is a dry run by default and backs up anything it replaces, and a verify script that confirms the deploy landed.

Report generated 2026-09-29T02:35:51 (UTC).

Check a site